Skip to content

Why Doesn’t My Gravity Posting Google Up, please

My post on the nature/origin of gravity doesn’t Google up

I’ve read the FAQs and searched the help center.
My URL is: http://universe-life.com/
My many attempts to email this letter to Google help-support were unsuccessful. Hence this posting, hoping to reach them this way…

Attn Google Help-Support:

In Nov 2013 I posted the below comprehension/definition of GRAVITY.
IMO this is a scientific feat of immense significance/consequences to science; again, IMO this is the greatest science feat since the early 1920s.
Yet when I search for it by Google it does not come up. Please explain why.

PS: immediately following my posting of the Gravity explanation/definition, 25 Nov 2013, I suffered a stroke. Released to return home from the hospital on Feb 24, 2014…

Sincerely yours,

Dov Henis
==============
On The Nature And Origin Of The Universe…
Classical Science Replaced By 2013 Gravity Comprehension !!!

איך נברא היקום יש מאין
New Science 2013 versus classical science
From http://universe-life.com/2014/02/24/gravity/

Attn classical science hierarchy, including Darwin and Einstein…

“I hope that now you understand what gravity is and why it is the monotheism of the universe…DH”
=================================
Gravity is the natural selection of self-attraction by the elementary particles of an evolving system on their cyclic course towards the self-replication of the system. Period
( Gravitons are the elementary particles of the universe. RNA nucleotides genes and serotonin are the elementary particles of Earth life)

כח המשיכה
כח המשיכה הוא הבחירה הטבעית להיצמדות הדדית של חלקיקי היסוד של מערכת מתפתחת במהלך התפתחותה המחזורית לעבר שיכפולה. נקודה
( הגרוויטון הוא חלקיק היסוד של היקום. הגנים, הנוקלאוטידים של חומצה ריבונוקלאית והסרוטונין הם החלקיקים היסודיים של חיי כדור הארץ) Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)

http://universe-life.com/2013/11/14/subverting-organized-religious-science/

http://universe-life.com/2013/09/03/the-shortest-grand-unified-theory/

New Science 2013 versus classical science

New Science 2013 versus classical science

 http://universe-life.com/2014/02/24/gravity/

Attn classical science hierarchy ( including Darwin and Einstein…)

 “I hope that now you understand what gravity is and why it is the monotheism of the universe…DH” 

Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)

http://universe-life.com/2013/11/14/subverting-organized-religious-science/

http://universe-life.com/2013/09/03/the-shortest-grand-unified-theory/

GRAVITY, Scientifically…

Learn what natural gravity is scientifically:
Think of the consequences re classical science of this comprehension of gravity…

איך נברא היקום יש מאין
Origin And Nature of the Universe, the greatest science feat since the early 1920s,
New Science 2013 versus classical science
Classical Science Is Replaced By 2013 Gravity Comprehension !!!

http://universe-life.com/2014/02/24/gravity/

Attn classical science hierarchy, including Darwin and Einstein…
“I hope that now you understand what gravity is and why it is the monotheism of the universe…DH”
=================================
Gravity is the natural selection of self-attraction by the elementary particles of an evolving system on their cyclic course towards the self-replication of the system. Period
( Gravitons are the elementary particles of the universe. RNA nucleotides genes and serotonin are the elementary particles of Earth life)
כח המשיכה
כח המשיכה הוא הבחירה הטבעית להיצמדות הדדית של חלקיקי היסוד של מערכת מתפתחת במהלך התפתחותה המחזורית לעבר שיכפולה. נקודה
( הגרוויטון הוא חלקיק היסוד של היקום. הגנים, הנוקלאוטידים של חומצה ריבונוקלאית והסרוטונין הם החלקיקים היסודיים של חיי כדור הארץ)
Dov Henis(comments from 22nd century)

http://universe-life.com/2013/11/14/subverting-organized-religious-science/

http://universe-life.com/2013/09/03/the-shortest-grand-unified-theory/

PS: Note, again:

- Classical Science Is Replaced By 2013 Gravity Comprehension !!!
- Think of the consequences re classical science of this comprehension of gravity…
DH

על השתחזרות היקום וחיים

על השתחזרות היקום וחיים

 Submitted on 2013/11/22

דב ידידי

אם תהליך המפץ הגדול חוזר על עצמו כל עשרים מיליארד שנים האם פירושו של דבר הוא שאותם בעלי-חיים יוצרו פעם נוספת? האם שאול גבעוני יווצר פעם נוספת במקום כלשהו ביקום? או שרק המפץ הגדול יחזור על עצמו בדייקנות כזו

 שאול

=========================

 שאול

התשובה ההגיונית התגובתית היא שעקב המספר העצום של המשתנים בהיסטוריה-מהות של כל אחד מאתנו אין היום ולא יהיה בעתיד סיכוי כלשהו לשיחזור קרוב למדויק.

ודרך-אגב, היסטוריית-חיים פירושה הגנום, כלומר סה’כ היסטוריות הורינו אחורה בזמן עד איזשהו מיקבץ-תרבית חידקים, חד-תאיים, לפני ביליוני שנים ….

 הגיוני וקרוב לוודאי שרק הקטבים הכל מסה(אחדיות) והכל אנרגיה (כל המסה מפורקת בחורים שחורים לגרוויטונים) משתחזרים

דב

 

 

From: Shaul Givoni [mailto:shaulgiv@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 6:14 PM
To: Dov Henis
Subject: Re: תולדת המספרים הגדולים

 

דב ידידי

אני מאושר שחזרת משם

אתה כבר בבית?

הרבה בריאת ואל תשכח את היקום! מה הוא יעשה

בלעדך?

שאול

‏בתאריך יום שני, 24 בפברואר 2014, Dov Henis <henisdov@netvision.net.il> כתב:

שלום ,שאול

חזרתי מעמק הבכא של הסובלים מאירוע מוחי לחיים  נורמליים, כמעט…

מדוע אין שני גרגירי חול או  שני פתיתי שלג זהים:

 כל דבר מעוצב מפגישתו עם המון המון דברים אחרים ועקב מספר הדברים בטבע אין סיכוי  ששני דברים ייפגשו עם דברים זהים .

לכן אין סיכוי למצוא דברים מעוצבים זהים ע’י הטבע

 ד”ש

דב

“Evolution does not operate with a goal”

ScienceDaily: “Evolution does not operate with a goal”

Unbelievable!

“Science”!  in Nov 2013 !

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/11/131114193434.htm

Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)

http://universe-life.com/2013/11/14/subverting-organized-religious-science/

http://universe-life.com/2013/09/03/the-shortest-grand-unified-theory/

Subverting Organized Religious Science

Subverting Organized Religious Science
I embarked on comprehending gravity in the process of my Don Quixotic mission to un-theosophize religious Science of the trade-union-church AAAS.

I pondered: IF life is just another mass format, as per my own long life experiences it is, then ALL mass formats must basically have common evolutionary origins-drives-features-ends, then the whole universe must have this same ESSENTIAL PARENT basic origin-nature.

Thus I arrived at comprehending what gravity is and why it is the monotheism of the universe.
And thus I became a denounced subverter of Organized Religious Science…

Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)
http://universe-life.com/

Decreasing Human Sperm Viability

Decreasing Human Sperm Viability

A. Intelligent Life

Life is an evolving system continuously undergoing natural selection i.e. continuously selecting, intelligently, opportunities to augment its energy constraint in order to survive i.e. in order to avoid its own mass format being re-converted to energy.

B. From

http://universe-life.com/2012/07/20/update-comprehension-of-culture-genetics/

I grow several fruits. Fruit trees are brainless, mindless, of low intelligence,  i.e. low extent of traits acquired by experience.

A fruit tree sprouts, starts producing many units of the fruit, of which only a small fraction complete their growth, of which in nature only few, if any at all,  evolve into trees to reproduce the fruit-tree genes. This is the genes reproduction mode of the less intelligent organisms, i.e. of the organisms less learned by experience. Plants are stationary, with lesser learning opportunities than mobile organisms. For survival in nature they depend on producing great numbers of progenies.

Observe/ponder other organisms including human cultural phenotypes and draw survival conclusions re the relationship between their intelligence and the number of their progenies…

Sentience, the ability to feel, perceive, or be conscious, or to have subjective experiences, holds for every organism. In essence it is the reaction of the organism to its circumstances. Now note : genes are organisms,  life’s primal organisms;  genetics is the progeny of culture, culture is response-reaction to circumstances, the extent and nature of genetics of an organism, of its genome, are proportional to the extent of survival challenges that its historical phenotype has been facing and to the extent of its resultant genome-neural constitution-history…

Now, Is it genetics that drive biological and cultural modifications?

NO. It is culture that modifies genetics, not genetics that modifies culture. Culture modifies genetics simply via the evolutionary intelligent natural selection process of the RNA ORGANISMS. Likewise many natural genetic changes are due to aging and/or circumstantial effects on the genes and/or genomes ORGANISMS, similar to aging and/or evolutionary processes in mono-cell communities (cultures) or in multi-celled organisms.

SCIENCE SHOULD UNFREEZE. SHOULD ADJUST ITS VISION, COMPREHENSION, CONCEPTS BEYOND AAAS TRADE-UNION-RELIGION, should apply Darwinism and Pavlovism to genes-genomes ORGANISMS.

C. From

http://universe-life.com/2011/07/10/seed-of-human-chimp-genomes-diversity/

“Page’s team compared human and chimp Ys to see whether either lineage has lost functional genes since they split. The researchers found that the chimp had indeed suffered the slings and arrows of evolutionary fortune. Of the 16 functional genes in this part of the human Y, chimps had lost the function of five due to mutations. In contrast, humans had all 11 functional genes also seen on the chimp Y.”  “The human Y chromosome hasn’t lost a gene in 6 million years,” says Page. “It seems like the demise of the hypothesis of the demise of the Y.”

Now, our genes and genomes are ORGANISMS. They continuously monitor the natural selection efficiency of our sperms versus the energetic costs of endowing them with their viability, and by thus this intelligent natural-selection process they select their expressions, with higher competence than some scientists…

D. Whose Sperm Decreases Viability

I’d reckon-expect that members of the historically now Western cultural phenotype would exhibit most pronounced sperm viability decrease due to their older-farther departure from natural selection by adaptation and adoption of pragmatic modifying of their circumstances, instead.

Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)

http://universe-life.com/

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.